I’m not sure Navy personnel decisions that are the result of discipline or perceived poor performance need to the subject of public press releases.
I would usually agree, but in this case I believe that the Navy is doing a very public retooling of the SEAL’s.
My guess is that these announcements are also being made to show not just the other services, but possibly other nations, that something more than just lip service is actually being done about the SEAL’s and their ass-hattery.
Lackland AFB?Services do it all of the time with other units and I've seen previous instances where a relieved ST commander had an article written about him. There's nothing unusual about this case.
Services do it all of the time with other units and I've seen previous instances where a relieved ST commander had an article written about him. There's nothing unusual about this case.
Lackland AFB?
I can appreciate the logic.
I suppose I'm of two minds on the subject. There's a significant public interest when we're talking about the commander of a major military unit. It's different than the guy managing the local Burger Thing. That said, absent criminal or near-criminal conduct (NJP), I don't know that a change of leadership requires the notification of literally everyone with internet access. I think there's a degree of personal privacy that should be considered, regardless of public employment.
I also think it's a matter of scale. I get that the Admiral wants to send a rocket into the NSW community (it's certainly warranted). However, might he achieve the same result within NSW by moving these dudes to a non-SOF assignment and distributing a memo internally that explains why the move was made?
I do agree with the idea of sunlight as a disinfectant. Who knows, maybe I'm just overthinking this because I'm used to working in organizations that don't publicly discuss disciplinary actions.
I’m tired of hearing about these guys, I’m tired of them stealing credit (see Rob O’neill Talking about the Red Wings rescue), and I’m tired of them killing fucking Army dudes. Which has gone on for years (that. Delta dude with the fake leg? Yeah he got shot by fucking SEALs).
SGM Yerry was shot by 6 when they came as QRF to a building Green had locked down and needed helping SSEing. They never deconflicted and entered the back and started clearing. They shot him in the leg.Das,
I'd like to hear more about the fake leg operator story. I seem to hear ALL the dirt on SEALs but that's a new one for me.
SGM Yerry was shot by 6 when they came as QRF to a building Green had locked down and needed helping SSEing. They never deconflicted and entered the back and started clearing. They shot him in the leg.
SGM Yerry was shot by 6 when they came as QRF to a building Green had locked down and needed helping SSEing. They never deconflicted and entered the back and started clearing. They shot him in the leg.
British hostage was killed during a rescue attempt( IIRC) by a SEAL delivered fragmentation grenade.What is their frag the hostage technique? Have a specific example?
Linda Norgrove In ‘09. Silver Squadron dude thought she was a terrorist. Threw a frag at her. Killed her. Initial word passed to the JOC was a dude clacked himself off with an S vest and killed her. Guy tells his TL, TL sits on it for a day or two and finally reports it up that “hey, my dude threw the frag...”What is their frag the hostage technique? Have a specific example?